MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580230362 · doi:10.47678/cjhe.v36i1.183524

Les étudiants en formation à l’enseignement professionnel au Québec : portrait d’un groupe particulier d’étudiants universitaires

2006· article· en· W1580230362 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
André Balleux

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Higher Education · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationPortraitTraining (meteorology)PedagogyPsychologySociologyMedical educationLibrary scienceArtMedicineGeographyArt historyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Registration in a university training program for teachers of vocational training represents a major transition characterized by a progressive rupture between practice of a trade and practice as a teacher. This situation particular to Quebec teachers of vocational training makes them unique students, with characteristics and profiles different from their colleagues of the general sector. This article presents the results of a study conducted with students enrolled in training programs for teaching vocational training at Sherbrooke University aimed at building a first portrait of this characteristic group. This research constitutes the first step in a process which will contribute to a better understanding of the identity, the problems and the peculiar situation of teachers of vocational training at their moment of transition between practice of a trade and teaching their trade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0180.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Higher EducationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207