MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580291878 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2005.1556443

Implementation of an MLP-based DOA system using a reduced number of MM-wave antenna elements

2006· article· en· W1580291878 on OpenAlexaff
E. Danneville, Jean‐Jules Brault, Jean‐Jacques Laurin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005. · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnechoic chamberAntenna (radio)Reflector (photography)Computer scienceAcousticsElectronic engineeringDirection of arrivalReflection (computer programming)EngineeringTelecommunicationsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is required to know the direction of arrival (DOA) of a signal in many applications, such as car tracking or reception optimization for satellite antenna. However, several reflections of different intensities highly affect the sensor outputs and the estimation quality. The system presented here is divided into three parts: a pair of three-element antenna arrays which receives the main beam and the reflected one, a radio frequency combiner which generates power signals and multilayer perceptron neural networks used to invert the mapping between the DOA space and the combiner output space. Simulations are carried out including a model of a simple reflection over a road. They are validated by experimental dataset provided by real antenna array outputs coming from tests using an asphalt reflector in an anechoic chamber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005.Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207