MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580413359 · doi:10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.12

PERSEPSI PEGIAT JENDER TERHADAP KONSEP PASAL 31 AYAT (3) UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN TENTANG STATUS KEPALA KELUARGA

2011· article· en· W1580413359 on OpenAlex
Tri Lisiani Prihatinah

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Dinamika Hukum · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Women's Rights
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeSociological researchPolitical scienceGender equalityLawGender studiesCriminologySociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some of gender activists assume that status of husband as a head of household is discriminating wife. Therefore, they propose a gender equality model which gives the same status to both husband and wife as a head of household altogether. By using sociological method and feminist legal analysis, it is resulted that most gender activists who become the source of information in this research do not agree with the proposed model of gender equality because they do believe its legal consequence will burden more to the wife. However, they agree that women develop their economic ability to ear money. These gender activists do not want to amend Article 31 (3) Law Number 1 Year 1974. They understand this article as a reflection of substantive equality which recognizes husband as a head of household’s status is parallel with the burden of the responsibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it