MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580505545 · doi:10.25145/j.pasos.2007.05.035

Travel, Tourism, and Hospitality Research: a handbook for managers and researchers.

2007· article· en· W1580505545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alfredo Ascanio

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHospitality and Tourism Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityTourismHospitality management studiesMarketingSociologyManagementBusinessLibrary scienceGeographyComputer scienceEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

46 researchers, 70% from the USA, 22% from Canada and 8% from other countries such as the Netherlands and England, have collaborated to write a 515-page manual entitled Travel, Tourism, and Hospitaly Research: a handbook for mana- gers and researchers, published by John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987 and under the responsibility of two research editors, namely: J.R.Brent Ritchie of the University of Calgary (Canada) and Charles R. Goeldner of the University of Colorado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.018
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.015
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.495
GPT teacher head0.596
Teacher spread0.101 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHospitality and Tourism EducationFrench-language works237,207