Bibliographic record
Abstract
~n descriptions of the Freudian model of the psyche (id/subconscious; ~ego/conscious; superego) and of the Freudian goal of bringing repressed ideas to the conscious' attention, the two most frequently used metaphors are: 1) that translating the psyche into a verticality, the id being the low or deep part of the psyche, as witnessed by the prefix "sub-" in "subconscious" (in German "Unterbewusstsein"), the conscious being a higher function, and the superego, as witnessed by the prefix "super-", (in German "Uberich") a layer imposed on top of that l 2) that of bringing to ''the light" of the conscious elements hidden in ''the darkness" of the subconscious.These two initial metaphors (verticality and visibility), aided by the subconscious' polyvalent metaphorization as "depth", were further combined into the prolific metaphor of the psyche as water.In his Interpretation of Dreams, a work in which metalinguistic metaphor is generally avoided, Freud, in opposition to the subconscious' "depth", expresses the conscious as "surface" (Oberfliiche), and then, as corollaries of this metaphor, describes repression as "submersion" (tauchen) and the conscious realization of formerly unconscious ideas as "emersion" (auftauchen, which refers specifically to emergence from waterV When the Surrealists, having assumed the Freudian model of the unconscious, referred to their own quest to "raise" (the verticality metaphor almost inevitable in metalanguage describing the Freudian model) elements from the unconscious, the metaphor of the psyche as water is often used.To take the single example of Breton's Vases Communicants, the metaphor appears, at least metonymically, three times in nine pages:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".