MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580674940 · doi:10.1063/1.1514670

Born–Oppenheimer breakdown in a combined-isotopomer analysis of the A 1Σu+–X 1Σg+ system of Li2

2002· article· en· W1580674940 on OpenAlexafffund
Xuejun Wang, Jenny Magnes, A. M. Lyyra, Amanda Ross, Françoise Martin, Peter M. Dove, Robert J. Le Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIsotopomersHomonuclear moleculeBorn–Oppenheimer approximationRotational–vibrational spectroscopyChemistryFourier analysisFourier transformAtomic physicsPolarization (electrochemistry)IsotopeKinetic isotope effectPhysicsMoleculeDeuteriumPhysical chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New high resolution polarization data have been obtained for the A–X band system of Li2 6,7, and new Fourier transform data for the homonuclear lithium dimers. They are combined with earlier data for Li26,6 and Li2 7,7 in the first systematic combined-isotopomer analysis of data for Li2 . This analysis of 8445 rovibrational transitions yields an improved and internally consistent set of molecular constant for the three Li2 isotopomers, and determines the electronic isotope shift and leading vibrational and rotational Born–Oppenheimer breakdown correction terms for both electronic states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207