MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580701759 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2015.7129464

Rapid-prototyping of iterative learning control using MATLAB/Simlink hybrid-programming

2015· article· en· W1580701759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMATLABIterative learning controlTestbedRapid prototypingComputer scienceControl engineeringSoftware prototypingControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceSoftwareSoftware developmentProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid-control-prototyping is an efficient mean of experimental study for control research. It is a challenge to exercise rapid-control-prototyping for iterative learning control (ILC) due to the finite time nature of ILC. This paper describes the construction of an ILC system based on MATLAB, Simulink, and Quanser WinCon. MATLAB/Simulink hybridprogramming is utilized to solve the complex task of rapid-prototyping for ILC. The built robotic system has been shown an effective testbed for ILC. The project can provide control students a good opportunity to gain hands-on proficiency with MATLAB/Simulink hybrid-programming, rapid-prototyping, and ILC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207