L’écologie sociale du suicide au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La fréquence exceptionnelle du suicide au Québec, depuis une trentaine d’années, est-elle généralisée, où se concentre-t-elle surtout dans sa majorité ethnoculturelle, de tradition canadienne-française ? Tandis qu’elle se stabilisait dans la région montréalaise, elle augmentait en périphérie. Est-ce dû au fait que les immigrants et les anglophones se concentrent en métropole ? Une comparaison entre les districts de CLSC de l’Île de Montréal selon leur rang sur l’échelle du suicide et sur celle d’autres indicateurs comme la langue maternelle, le statut d’immigrant, la religion, la solitude et la pauvreté, puis, plus succinctement, entre les régions du Québec, confirme que le suicide semble plus courant dans les milieux de vieille souche francophone. Mais pour en explorer davantage les raisons, il faudrait mieux comprendre comment le logement solitaire ou le faible revenu infléchissent les probabilités de se donner la mort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".