MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580950136 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab259

259 INVOLVEMENT OF Ca2+/CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE II IN THE SPONTANEOUS ACTIVATION IN RAT OOCYTES

2004· article· en· W1580950136 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jim Yoo, L.C. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOocyteOocyte activationAndrologyGerminal vesicleMetaphaseCalmodulinMaturation promoting factorMeiosisBiologyInternal medicineIn vitroEndocrinologyOviductProtein kinase AProtein kinase CKinaseMolecular biologyChemistryCalciumCell biologyEmbryoBiochemistryMedicineCyclinCell cycleApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immediately after recovery from the oviduct, rat metaphase-arrested oocytes are very sensitive to spontaneous activation (SA), which is characterized by resumption of meiotic division followed by the cytoplasmic scattering of chromosomes. Although it has been shown that proteasome inhibitor is effective in stopping SA, it is likely that an upstream event is controlling SA. Constitutively active Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) triggers cyclin B destruction and release from MII arrest. To investigate the kinetics and mechanism of rat spontaneous oocyte activation, we (1) compared SA status after different periods of aging in oviducts and examined the effects of hyalurondiase treatment, (2) compared SA between Ca2+-free and Ca2+-containing conditions, (3) examined the pattern of SA after using CaMII inhibitor and proteasome inhibitor, and (4) analyzed the activity of CaMKII at different times after oocyte collection. Oocytes were collected from three 4-wk-old PMSG-primed Sprague Dawley rats. ANOVA Tukey-Kramer HSD was used for statistical analysis using a P value of 0.05. Each experiment contained at least four replicates with at least 100 oocytes. Experiment 1: Oocytes were collected at different times post-hCG injection (14, 18, 22 h) and cumulus cells were removed before or after 2 h of in vitro culture with hyaluronidase. There was no difference in SA due to oocyte aging in oviducts or hyalurondiase treatment. Experiment 2: Oocytes were cultured in Ca2+-containing and Ca2+-free KSOM for 2 h after collection at different times (14, 18, 22 h) post hCG injection. Although there were no differences among Ca2+-containing KSOM culture groups (91%, 82%, and 90%, respectively), Ca2+-free KSOM significantly decreased SA at 14, 18, and 22 h post-hCG (19%, 43%, and 51%, respectively). Experiment 3: Oocytes were treated with different doses of inhibitor of CaMKII, myr-AIP (10, 20, 50, 100 µM), and proteosome inhibitor MG132 (10, 20, 50, 100 µM) after oocyte collection. Fifty and 100 µM myr-AIP induced significantly lower SA (36%, and 17%) than 0, 10, 20 µM (91%, 65%, and 53%, respectively). Moreover, higher concentrations of MG132 (50 and 100 µM) induced significantly lower SA rates (6% and 5%) than 0, 10, 20 µM (91%, 41%, and 22%, respectively). We also investigated the effect of short exposures to myr-AIP and MG132 during the first 2 min post-recovery. The myr-AIP group produced significantly lower SA compared to control and MG132-treated groups. Experiment 4: Oocytes collected at different times (0, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 90 min) were used for CaMKII activity assay. CaMKII activity increased at 20 min and remained high for 30 min followed by decreased activity by 60 min. In conclusion, CaMKII seems to be one of the upstream signals that causes rat oocytes to spontaneously activate after recovery. Financial support was provided by NSERC and Canada Research Chairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207