MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580951380 · doi:10.1063/1.1850253

The magnetic structure of Nd5Sn4

2005· article· en· W1580951380 on OpenAlexaff
H. B. Wang, Z. Altounian, D. H. Ryan, J. M. Cadogan, I. P. Swainson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesMcGill University
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsMagnetic structureAntiferromagnetismOrthorhombic crystal systemNeutron diffractionMagnetic momentCrystallographyMössbauer spectroscopySpace groupCondensed matter physicsChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceCrystal structureDiffractionX-ray crystallographyMagnetizationPhysicsMagnetic fieldOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nd 5 Sn 4 adopts the orthorhombic Pnma structure, and orders antiferromagnetically below 36(3) K. The neutron diffraction pattern at 4 K reveals that the magnetic space group is Pn′m′a′, a complex canted-antiferromagnetic structure. The Nd 4c magnetic mode is AxCz, and the Nd 8d magnetic mode is Ax−Gy−Cz−. The Nd magnetic moments are 1.76(8), 2.44(12), and 2.63(10)μB at 4c, 8d1, and 8d2 sites, respectively. These results are in agreement with our Mössbauer spectroscopy and magnetic measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207