Capacity maximization in eigen-MIMO with channel estimation and CSI feedback-link throughput constraint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water-filled eigenchannels offer the highest multi-input multi-output MIMO information-theoretic capacity, but digital techniques such as quadrature amplitude modulation and finite block lengths will degrade the capacity from the Shannon limit to the capacity of a digital link. Furthermore, eigen-MIMO requires channel overheads, such as estimating the channel state information CSI and feeding it back to the transmitter, which further compromise the capacity. In this paper, the joint influence of channel estimation and imperfect feedback on the information-theoretic capacity and the practicable capacity is analyzed. The channel is modeled as static over a MIMO channel block. In each block, the forward channel is used for CSI estimation and for the payload data transmission. In the back direction, the channel is used to feed back a quantized form of the CSI to the transmitter with a throughput constraint. These three channel usages are combined into an effective simplex channel simplifying the capacity analysis. The capacities are formulated as functions of the link parameters, enabling optimization of the number of training symbols, the feedback duration, and the power allocation for training and data transfer, with the criterion of maximum capacity. The results presented are subject to the usual approximations used in communications theory. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".