MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1581056533 · doi:10.1002/acs.2580

Almost invariant manifold approach for adaptive estimation of periodic and aperiodic unknown time‐varying parameters

2015· article· en· W1581056533 on OpenAlexafffund
Ehsan Moshksar, Martin Guay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
KeywordsAperiodic graphManifold (fluid mechanics)MathematicsEstimation theoryNonlinear systemInvariant (physics)Applied mathematicsDynamical systems theoryUpper and lower boundsLTI system theoryExponential functionConvergence (economics)Control theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematical analysisLinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This paper provides a novel identification technique for the estimation of time‐varying parameters in a class of nonlinear dynamical systems. The concept of almost invariant manifold is used to find an implicit mapping from known variables of the system to the unknown variables. A parameter estimation update law is generated from the proposed mapping. The exponential convergence of parameter estimation error to a small neighbourhood of the origin is achieved. The algorithm is extended to estimate the uncertain periodic parameters. An upper bound estimation of the unknown periodic parameters and their time derivatives are obtained. Unlike most periodic time‐varying parameter estimation techniques, only the knowledge of the number of distinctive frequencies is assumed. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated with two simulation examples. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207