Du placard à l’institution : l’histoire des Archives gaies du Québec (AGQ)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the 25th anniversary of the Archives gaies du Québec (AGQ), the author chronicles the various steps in the development of the institution over the years. Its most important acquisitions are mentioned, as are activities relating to the acquisition and processing of collections, their preservation, and especially the diffusion of materials related to the mission of the AGQ. Questions relating to the management of an institution that relies on self-financing and volunteer-work are also addressed. RÉSUMÉSuite au 25e anniversaire des Archives gaies du Québec, l’auteur relate les diverses étapes du développement de l’organisme, au fil des années écoulées. Les plus importantes acquisitions sont mentionnées, tout comme les activités relatives à l’acquisition et au traitement des collections, à leur conservation et surtout à la diffusion des contenus liés à la mission des AGQ. Les questions relatives à la gestion d’un organisme, dans un contexte d’autofinancement et de bénévolat, sont aussi abordées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".