MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W158124372

Promoting Health Equity through Political Action

2010· article· en· W158124372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial alternatives · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth equityEquity (law)PoliticsSocial determinants of healthHealth policyHealth careIdeologyPolitical scienceVotingPublic healthPopulationEconomic growthEconomicsDevelopment economicsPolitical economySociologyMedicineLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between health equity and the distribution of economic and social resources in a society is not well understood by the voting public in the English-speaking world. Yet, growing evidence shows that countries with a more equal distribution of resources such as income, housing, and health care among others have higher population health status and greater health equity compared to countries with higher inequalities. Even less well understood are the factors that can contribute to or hamper the achieving of health equity in a society, particularly the role of politics and political ideology. In this article I examine how political action can promote health equity. Specifically, I consider the role of politics in the development and implementation of public policies that promote health equity. These issues are examined from a political economy perspective which treats politics and economics as fundamentally related. Political economy is also concerned with the role of political ideology, the market, political power, and political ideology in shaping public policy decisions on health-related issues. Introduction The relationship between health equity and the distribution of economic and social resources in a society is not well understood by the voting public in the English-speaking world. Yet, growing evidence shows that countries with a more equal distribution of resources such as income, housing, and health care among others have higher population health status and greater health equity compared to countries with higher inequalities (Caiman 1997; Navarro 2002; Carr et al. 1999; OECD 2008). What seems to be less well understood are the factors that can contribute to or hamper the achieving of health equity in a society. For the purposes of this article, health equity refers to the achieving of equalities in health between groups (Braveman and Gruskin 2003). Inequalities in health outcomes are usually traceable to unequal distribution of income and other resources such as power or social and economic status in society. Existing political, economic and social structures consign groups in society to conditions of advantage or disadvantage on the basis of income-usually low income-but also, gender (female), race (populations of colour), disability, or sexual orientation, among others (Braveman and Gruskin 2003). These attributes become markers of difference leading to unequal conditions, and poor health outcomes for these groups. Equity is frequently equated with social justice and ensuring fairness for all individuals and groups, regardless of their gender, race, or other attributes. Governments intervene in the workings of the economy to ensure all members of a population have access to resources, social programs and services to meet their basic material needs such as housing, education, income support, and health care: the social determinants of health (SDOH). Access to these goods and services ensures health equity. The SDOH mediate between public policy and health equity. The creation of the welfare state in western political economies following the Second World War ensured that all citizens in a jurisdiction had access to public goods such as income support programs (for example, social assistance, unemployment insurance, pensions), health care, and other services (Teeple 2000). Inherent in countries with comprehensive welfare states is respect for human rights and specific protections to ensure the material security, health and well-being of citizens. The extent of the welfare state directly determines the extent of social and health inequalities and health equity in nations. In recent years, however, governments in some western countries, particularly Canada and United States, have reduced health and social spending (Teeple 2000). This has led to growing poverty and health and social inequalities in both countries. Indeed, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) identified Canada as having one of the largest increases in inequality among western developed nations (OECD 2008). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it