MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W158124372

Promoting Health Equity through Political Action

2010· article· en· W158124372 sur OpenAlex
Toba Bryant

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSocial alternatives · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth equityEquity (law)PoliticsSocial determinants of healthHealth policyHealth careIdeologyPolitical scienceVotingPublic healthPopulationEconomic growthEconomicsDevelopment economicsPolitical economySociologyMedicineLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The relationship between health equity and the distribution of economic and social resources in a society is not well understood by the voting public in the English-speaking world. Yet, growing evidence shows that countries with a more equal distribution of resources such as income, housing, and health care among others have higher population health status and greater health equity compared to countries with higher inequalities. Even less well understood are the factors that can contribute to or hamper the achieving of health equity in a society, particularly the role of politics and political ideology. In this article I examine how political action can promote health equity. Specifically, I consider the role of politics in the development and implementation of public policies that promote health equity. These issues are examined from a political economy perspective which treats politics and economics as fundamentally related. Political economy is also concerned with the role of political ideology, the market, political power, and political ideology in shaping public policy decisions on health-related issues. Introduction The relationship between health equity and the distribution of economic and social resources in a society is not well understood by the voting public in the English-speaking world. Yet, growing evidence shows that countries with a more equal distribution of resources such as income, housing, and health care among others have higher population health status and greater health equity compared to countries with higher inequalities (Caiman 1997; Navarro 2002; Carr et al. 1999; OECD 2008). What seems to be less well understood are the factors that can contribute to or hamper the achieving of health equity in a society. For the purposes of this article, health equity refers to the achieving of equalities in health between groups (Braveman and Gruskin 2003). Inequalities in health outcomes are usually traceable to unequal distribution of income and other resources such as power or social and economic status in society. Existing political, economic and social structures consign groups in society to conditions of advantage or disadvantage on the basis of income-usually low income-but also, gender (female), race (populations of colour), disability, or sexual orientation, among others (Braveman and Gruskin 2003). These attributes become markers of difference leading to unequal conditions, and poor health outcomes for these groups. Equity is frequently equated with social justice and ensuring fairness for all individuals and groups, regardless of their gender, race, or other attributes. Governments intervene in the workings of the economy to ensure all members of a population have access to resources, social programs and services to meet their basic material needs such as housing, education, income support, and health care: the social determinants of health (SDOH). Access to these goods and services ensures health equity. The SDOH mediate between public policy and health equity. The creation of the welfare state in western political economies following the Second World War ensured that all citizens in a jurisdiction had access to public goods such as income support programs (for example, social assistance, unemployment insurance, pensions), health care, and other services (Teeple 2000). Inherent in countries with comprehensive welfare states is respect for human rights and specific protections to ensure the material security, health and well-being of citizens. The extent of the welfare state directly determines the extent of social and health inequalities and health equity in nations. In recent years, however, governments in some western countries, particularly Canada and United States, have reduced health and social spending (Teeple 2000). This has led to growing poverty and health and social inequalities in both countries. Indeed, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) identified Canada as having one of the largest increases in inequality among western developed nations (OECD 2008). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,758
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,985

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,136
Tête enseignante GPT0,452
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle