MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1581277665

Voices we never hear: the unsettling histories of postwar 'ten pound Poms' who returned to Britain

2002· article· en· W1581277665 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alistair Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPound (networking)ImmigrationQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryPoetryGenealogyEconomic historyAncient historyArtLiteratureArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Return migrants - invisible twice over In 1962 Mary Holmes emigrated from Newport to Australia with her farmer husband and five children. The Holmes were among more than a million Britons who took an assisted passage to Australia in the quarter century after the Second World War. Under this migration scheme, British adults paid only ten pounds to travel to the other side of the world while their children went free. In Australia these immigrants became known as the 'ten pound Poms'. In 1963, and five years before the Holmes family eventually returned to Wales, Mary Holmes wrote a poem, 'The Migrant's Dilemma'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0310.027
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207