Images de la domination en temps de crise : l'exemple des stalles de la collégiale de Montréal (Yonne, Bourgogne) à la charnière entre Moyen Âge et Renaissance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le pouvoir royal a fait l’objet de nombreuses discussions et de multiples ecrits au Moyen Âge. Or la plupart de ces discussions portaient surtout sur le necessaire equilibre de ce pouvoir avec l’autorite sacerdotale – equilibre erige en ideal. Ces dissensions entre auctoritas et potestas culminent a l’epoque charniere entre le Moyen Âge et la Renaissance ou une crise triple intervient : politique avec l’election imperiale, religieuse avec la Reforme et la Contre-Reforme, intellectuelle avec l’avenement de l’heliocentrisme. L’ensemble de stalles de la collegiale de Montreal (Yonne, Bourgogne), datant des environs de 1520, fait reference a ce contexte trouble a travers un projet iconographique presentant deux exemples de dominations face a face : le pouvoir royal d’un cote et l’autorite sacerdotale de l’autre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".