Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine les deux origines, logique dans la théorie économique et historique dans l’histoire de la pensée économique, de l’entrepreneur chez J. A. Schumper. L’origine logique réside dans la nécessité analytique de construire un « type entrepreneur », comme type particulier d’agent économique, pour rendre intelligible le processus de transformation économique. Ce type permet le passage de l’analyse statique, le circuit walrasien, à celle dynamique de l’évolution économique. L’origine historique de ce type entrepreneur ne fait pas de Schumpeter un auteur aussi original que l’on pourrait le penser. Quelques années avant, de nombreux auteurs importants, et bien connus de Schumper, avaient déjà proposé des descriptions de l’entrepreneur très proches de celle de Schumpeter. Parmi ceux-ci, Max Weber, Werner Sombart, Alfred Marshall, Paul Leroy-Beaulieu et Friedrich von Wieser sont ici étudiés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".