Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with the unilateralism and inconsistencies in United States foreign policy and its impact on the functions and independence of United Nations. The overall background of the UN and its limitations from its inception are analyzed in relation to the US decisions to arbitrarily intervene or undermine its neutrality, which are exemplified most conspicuously by the war in Iraq. Criticism amounts as the US continues to bypass the mediatory multilateral functions of UN in a narrow pursuit of economic and political interest. It is also important to note how the lack of coherence in US foreign policy has adversely affected the operation of UN. Thus, this study examines the history of the US-UN relations, and how inconsistency in US foreign policies, from multilateral to unilateral and vice versa, has affected the UN as well as the global society. In addition, the war in Iraq and the chronological story of the battle between the US and the UN is analyzed as the up-most power struggle between the world's sole super power and the world governing body. Finally, this paper discusses the measures for enhancing the independence of the UN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it