MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1581549485 · doi:10.3917/ep.066.0110

Comment être un caregiver sensible lors de l’accueil d’une famille en hôpital de jour ?

2015· article· fr· W1581549485 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Véron

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances & Psy · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsSte. Anne's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour faciliter le soin en hôpital de jour des enfants, l’alliance thérapeutique entre les parents et les soignants est indispensable. Cet article donne une illustration pratique de certains aspects de la théorie de l’attachement par le témoignage d’une éducatrice spécialisée. Les difficultés à « prendre soin de ceux qui prennent soin » incitent à interroger les apports de cette théorie dans la compréhension des comportements d’attachement : que ce soient ceux des parents envers leurs enfants, envers la structure soignante, mais aussi ceux des soignants eux-mêmes en retour. Cela amène à expliciter les modifications de certaines postures professionnelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnfances & PsySame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207