MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1581806160

International Workshop on Methane Hydrate Research and Development (4th) Held in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada on May 9-11, 2005

2006· article· en· W1581806160 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard B. Coffin, Ross Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceAgency (philosophy)Government (linguistics)Research centerPolitical scienceGeographySociologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fourth Workshop of the International Committee on Gas Hydrates Research and Development was held during 9-11 May 2005 in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Invited national agency representatives and international researchers from university, government, and industry convened to assess research priorities and to promote international collaboration on methane hydrate research. The 2.5-day workshop included plenary lectures and panel discussions, conducted as a working event where all participants engaged in open discussions to develop collaborative methane hydrate studies. The workshop was organized by the Centre for Earth and Ocean Research at the University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; the Marine Biogeochemistry Section at the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA, the Hawaii Natural Energy Institute of the University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, and in cooperation with the Institute for Energy Utilization, AIST, Hokkaido, Japan; the Department of Physics and Technology at the University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; the Office of Naval Research - Global; the Geological Survey of Canada, and the United States Department of Energy. This series of annual international methane hydrate research and development workshops was initiated during March 2001 at the University of Hawaii. Subsequent workshops have been held in Washington, DC, USA and Vina Del Mar, Chile. At the previous three meetings, the focus was on presentaiton of research results on selected hydrate themes and description of national hydrate research programs. The workshops have resulted in international field and laboratory collaborations between U.S., Candadian, Japanese, Chilean, and German scientists working on methane hydrate exploration off the coasts of U.S., Canada, Chile, and Japan. At the Victoria workshop, the objective was more ambitious. A primary goal was to begin discussions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207