MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1581809205

SHOALS Object Detection

2010· article· en· W1581809205 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Yang, P. E. LaRocque

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Hydrographic Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoalBathymetryUnderwaterLidarHydrographyObject detectionRemote sensingHydrographic surveyObject (grammar)Computer scienceGeographyIdentification (biology)GeologyArtificial intelligenceCartographyOceanographyPattern recognition (psychology)ArchaeologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the past decade, SHOALS (Scanning Hydrographic Operational Airborne Lidar Survey) has proven to be an efficient and cost-effective means for large-area coastal mapping projects. However, its capabilities in the rapid reconnaissance of small underwater obstructions have been less appreciated, despite a demonstrated history of successful detection and spatial identification. This paper discusses SHOALS‘ object detection capabilities in light of the recent developments in object detection algorithms, with multiple situation studies to illustrate its overall performance and latest enhancements. Various aspects of object detection using airborne bathymetric lidar are discussed to highlight the challenges and advantages of using SHOALS for rapid reconnaissance of small underwater obstructions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Hydrographic ReviewSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207