MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1581943849

用AFLP分子标记技术鉴别甘蔗(Saccharum officinarum L.)品种

2003· article· zh· W1581943849 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
李鸣, 谭裕模, 李杨瑞, 李容柏, 高国庆

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2003
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccharum officinarumGeographyBiologyBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本研究采用AFLP技术,从64对引物中筛选出5对带型分布均匀、多态性丰富且分辨能力强的引物,对两个在生产上广泛推广应用的甘蔗品种的AFLP指纹图谱进行分析,计算了两品种间的遗传相似性和遗传距离.结果表明,5对引物在2个甘蔗品种间均存在显著的差异,其中多态性位点占总扩增位点的10.2%,区分率达100%.研究结果对生产上应用AFLP技术鉴定甘蔗品种的真伪性提供了依据.本文对甘蔗AFLP分析体系的关键技术以及银染技术的安全性和可靠性进行了讨论.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicSugarcane Cultivation and ProcessingFrench-language works237,207