Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acoustics is an integral factor of indoor environmental quality, and it's essential that suspended ceilings systems of modern office building provide adequate acoustical separation.This paper evaluates the acoustic performance for different suspended ceilings systems installed in rooms with dividing partitions as to their speech privacy characteristics.The relation between speech privacy index and ceiling attenuation class (CAC), articulation class (AC), and subjective speech privacy rating has also been presented in this paper.r s u m L'acoustique est un facteur intgrante de la qualit de l'environnement intrieur, et il est essentiel que les systmes de suspension des plafonds de immeuble de bureaux moderne de fournir suffisamment de sparation acoustique.Cet article value la performance acoustique pour diffrents systmes de plafonds suspendus installs sur les chambres de sparation des partitions des fins de confidentialit de la parole.En outre la relation entre l'indice de la confidentialit des conversations et le plafond d'attnuation de classe CAC, classe d'articulation, AC et subjective Note confidentialit de la parole a t prsent dans le prsent document.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".