MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1582490709 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.225987

Requirement of neuronal connexin36 in pathways mediating presynaptic inhibition of primary afferents in functionally mature mouse spinal cord

2012· article· en· W1582490709 on OpenAlexafffund
Wendy Bautista, J.I. Nagy, Yue Dai, David A. McCrea

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSpinal cordNeurosciencePresynaptic inhibitionBiologyChemistryInhibitory postsynaptic potentialExcitatory postsynaptic potential

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points Reflexes evoked by sensory information from muscles and skin play an important role in controlling muscle activity during movement. The strength of these reflexes is regulated in part by presynaptic inhibition, a process controlling the release of chemical transmitters from sensory fibres terminating on spinal neurones. Our study is the first to show that electrical synapses among spinal neurones in young animals are essential for normal operation of processes that presynaptically regulate synaptic transmission between large diameter sensory fibres and spinal cord neurones. Transgenic mice lacking connexin36, a protein that mediates electrical communication via gap junctions between neurones, suffer a severe impairment of presynaptic inhibition and a similar impairment can be produced in normal mice with drugs that disrupt gap junction function. The wide distribution of connexin36 in the spinal cord suggests that neuronal gap junctions also play a role in other physiological processes. Abstract Electrical synapses formed by gap junctions containing connexin36 (Cx36) promote synchronous activity of interneurones in many regions of mammalian brain; however, there is limited information on the role of electrical synapses in spinal neuronal networks. Here we show that Cx36 is widely distributed in the spinal cord and is involved in mechanisms that govern presynaptic inhibition of primary afferent terminals. Electrophysiological recordings were made in spinal cord preparations from 8‐ to 11‐day‐old wild‐type and Cx36 knockout mice. Several features associated with presynaptic inhibition evoked by conditioning stimulation of low threshold hindlimb afferents were substantially compromised in Cx36 knockout mice. Dorsal root potentials (DRPs) evoked by low intensity stimulation of sensory afferents were reduced in amplitude by 79% and in duration by 67% in Cx36 knockouts. DRPs were similarly affected in wild‐types by bath application of gap junction blockers. Consistent with presynaptic inhibition of group Ia muscle spindle afferent terminals on motoneurones described in adult cats, conditioning stimulation of an adjacent dorsal root evoked a long duration inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes recorded from the ventral root in wild‐type mice, and this inhibition was antagonized by bicuculline. The same conditioning stimulation failed to inhibit monosynaptic reflexes in Cx36 knockout mice. Immunofluorescence labelling for Cx36 was found throughout the dorsal and ventral horns of the spinal cord of juvenile mice and persisted in mature animals. In deep dorsal horn laminae, where interneurones involved in presynaptic inhibition of large diameter muscle afferents are located, cells were extensively dye‐coupled following intracellular neurobiotin injection. Coupled cells displayed Cx36‐positive puncta along their processes. Our results indicate that gap junctions formed by Cx36 in spinal cord are required for maintenance of presynaptic inhibition, including the regulation of transmission from Ia muscle spindle afferents. In addition to a role in presynaptic inhibition in juvenile animals, the persistence of Cx36 expression among spinal neuronal populations in the adult mouse suggests that the contribution of electrical synapses to integrative processes in fully mature spinal cord may be as diverse as that found in other areas of the CNS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207