MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1582493312 · doi:10.1109/chicc.2015.7260361

Event-based state estimation of a discrete-state hidden Markov model through a reliable communication channel

2015· article· en· W1582493312 on OpenAlexaff
Dawei Shi, Robert J. Elliott, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent (particle physics)Hidden Markov modelComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Lossy compressionState (computer science)Markov processMarkov modelMarkov chainSet (abstract data type)Probability distributionAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMachine learningComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a state estimation problem is considered for a hidden Markov model subject to event-based sensor measurement updates sent through a reliable communication channel. The change of probability approach is utilized to consider the estimation problem, and an analytical expression for the probability distributions of the states conditioned on all the past hybrid point- and set-valued measurement information caused by the event-triggering scheme is obtained. Also, it is shown that the scenario with a lossy channel, but without the event-trigger, can be treated as a special case of the reliable channel results, and thus can be solved by applying the proposed results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207