MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diaspora et patrimoine : une source perpétuelle de conflit

2010· article· fr· W1582506904 on OpenAlexaff
H. Martin Wobst

Bibliographic record

VenueMuseum International (Edition Francaise) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaEthnologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Cet article s’intéresse aux interactions entre les populations et leur diaspora, en tant que sources et amplificateurs de problèmes et de conflits. Que ce soit sur le plan de leurs biens matériels ou immatériels, les populations et leur diaspora se constituent l’une l’autre, les diasporas apportant souvent une contribution plus importante au poids sémantique du patrimoine, et à des axes de conflit que l’on peut aisément tracer, que les populations dont elles sont issues à l’origine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuseum International (Edition Francaise)Same topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207