Les juristes juifs russes en France et l'action internationale dans les années vingt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some jewish lawyers from Russia stand out as a conspicuous group in France, and some of them appear as the main figures in the sphere of law : Maxime Vinaver, Boris MirkineGuetzevitch, Andre Mandelstam, Alexandre Michelson, Moïse Goldstein, Henry Sliosberg. During the twenties, they took a very active part both on the ground of doctrinal consideration and because of their individual commitments, these law-men joined circles in Geneva which dealt with the Russian League for the League of Nations or the Executive Committee of the private organizations belonging to the State Commission for Refugees, taking concerted action with the spokesmen of the russian refugees. Their involvement in the law trend for which the rights of people and man were considered as the main topic of International Right, is in accordance with their previous political involvements and their individual philosophical beliefs. As an aspect of emigration it also lies within the scope of an identity definition strongly stamped by their belonging to the russian liberal and legalistic intelligentsia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".