The Work of Tribal Hands: Southeastern Split Cane Basketry

Work of Tribal Hands: Southeastern Cane Basketry. DAYNA BOWKER LEE and HIRAM F. GREGORY (eds.). Northwestern State University Press, Natchitoches, LA, 2006. xviii + 229 pp., 147 illus., biblio. $30.00 (paper), ISBN: 0917898273. Reviewed by Matthew T. Bradley This volume is the result of the Southeastern Indian Basketry Gathering held at Northwestern State University May 2002. While the basketmakers present at the gathering worked with the range of materials used across the Southeast, it quickly became apparent that what seemed most ancient, most indigenous, to Southeastern Indian people was the use of river cane and the weaving of split cane (p. v). This fact, along with the general paucity of literature addressing cane basketry, motivated the creation of this collection. Tim Oakes's contribution, Native Cane Conservation Guide: Arundinaria gigantea ssp. tecta, Traditionally Known as Swamp Cane, seems somewhat misplaced as the fourteenth and final substantive chapter of the collection. This essay on the ecology of canebrakes and the collaborative efforts of the Mississippi Choctaw and various public agencies to ensure their survival is informative and well-written but would have seemed a natural to lead off the collection rather than to close it. As is, the essays commence with a version of The Chitimacha Origin of Basket Weaving as told by Chief Benjamin Paul (whether the tale has been translated or was originally recounted Chitimacha is not indicated). An endnote thanks the Chitimacha Cultural Department for the use of the story; beyond a photo of Chief Paul and his sister dated ca. 1930s, no further contextualizing information is provided. It is thus difficult to situate the chapter, a difficulty shared by all of the essays this collection to a greater or lesser degree: Some thematic information is provided a four-page introduction by Gary White Deer, but the book would be improved by clearer thematic structuring. In the same vein, the biographical information regarding the academics, weavers, culture resource professionals, and arts and crafts retailers contributing to the collection would have been much more helpful had it been presented a blurb preceding each individual chapter rather than appendixed as the final chapter titled Contributors. These formatting issues are the book's only real shortcomings and they do not negate the valuable information which it presents. But they do make that information more difficult to access, and increased accessibility could have been purchased with relatively minor effort here. All of the contributions engage the past to some degree. Marshall Gettys's, Sarah Hill's, Dustin Fugua's, and one of Dayna Bowker Lee's chapters each deal with an event or tradition that is in the past. Gettys discusses the transfer of Choctaw basketry technology to Oklahoma and its eventual abandonment, which he attributes to the loss of the traditional foodways associated with the basketry. This is concurrent with the lack of development of a local art market basketry. Hill uses the life history of Cherokee metis Rachel Davis as a backdrop to discuss Cherokee double-weave cane basketry. Fugua presents the case of seven cane baskets held the Cane River Creole National Historic Park. He brings evidence to bear on the unknown tribal affiliations of the pieces while also making an implicit request for aid conserving them. Lee's Five Caddo Baskets from Indian Territory uses the Caddo baskets collected by M. R. Harrington to illustrate a now extinct tradition. Robert Neuman's Split Cane Items Louisiana: A View from Archaeology and Ethnology has the greatest time depth of any selection, presenting archaeologically recovered data from Mississippian sites. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.