Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to Graphics Interface 2006. This annual conference, now in its 32nd year, is devoted to computer graphics, interactive systems, and human-computer interaction. Beginning in 1969 as the Canadian Man-Computer Communications Seminar (CMCCS), it is the oldest regularly-scheduled computer graphics and human-computer interaction conference. This year, Graphics Interface was held June 9--11, 2006 in Quebec, Quebec.A total of 94 submissions were received, of which 31 papers were accepted. The final program is balanced between HCI and computer graphics, with both tracks seeing similar acceptance rates: 17/44 for the HCI track, and 14/50 for the graphics track.The program committee consisted of 21 international experts, 18 of which attended the program committee meeting held in mid February at UBC. The great majority of papers recieved 5 reviews, two of which were from program committee members, and 3 from external reviewers.For further information about the conference series we invite you to visit the web site:http://www.graphicsinterface.org/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it