MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1583127206 · doi:10.1089/g4h.2020.0024

El Derecho Romano después de Europa: la historia jurídica para la formación del jurista y ciudadano europeo

2006· article· en· W1583127206 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dario Mantovani

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista general de derecho romano · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative International Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerechoContext (archaeology)HumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolPartiendo de la consideracion de que es el jurista europeo, el autor cuestiona la formacion que este debe recibir en el nuevo contexto de la Europa unida y cual es el significado que el derecho romano (?que derecho romano?) puede anadir en esta nueva fase, dentro de las facultades de derecho y en sus distintos momentos formativos. EnglishBased on the concept of what an European jurist is, the author debates on the training that that jurist should receive in the context of a united Europe, and what is the meaning that the Roman law (which Roman law?) may add to this phase within the law schools and in their different educational phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista general de derecho romanoSame topicComparative International Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207