Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction to Part I Becoming Acquainted with Social Policy Introduction to Part II Pursing Social Policy Ideals at the International Level: An NGO Perspective The Federal Government and Social Policy at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century: Reflections on Change and Continuity Human Rights Legislation, Court Rulings, and Social Policy Active Citizenship, Social Workers, and Social Policy Program and Policy Development from a Holistic Aboriginal Perspective Citizen Participation in Social Policy Evaluating Social Welfare Policies and Programs Introduction to Part III Child Poverty and the Canadian Welfare State Back to the Present: Rethinking Risk Assessment in Child Welfare Native Peoples and Child Welfare Practices: Implicating Social Work Education Mental Health Policy in Canada Housing and Homelessness Single Motherhood in the Canadian Landscape: Postcards from a Subject Workfare: Ten Years of Pickin' on the Poor Toward Inclusion Of Gay And Lesbian People: Social Policy Changes in Relation To Sexual Orientation Immigration and Refugee Policy in Canada: Past, Present, and Future Universal Health Care: Normative Legacies Adrift Caring and Ageing: Exposing the Policy Issues Canadians with Disabilities The Challenges Ahead Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".