On ne vieillit plus aujourd’hui de la même façon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'institution de l'État providence a été marquée par la création de toute une série de programmes sociaux destinés à améliorer les conditions de vie des personnes âgées. Ces développements majeurs ont consacré l'institutionnalisation du vieillissement en induisant une association formelle entre l'âge de 60 ou 65 ans et l'entrée dans la vieillesse. La situation financière, sanitaire et sociale des personnes âgées a toutefois considérablement évolué au cours des trente dernières années. On ne vieillit plus aujourd'hui de la même façon qu'hier. Il est donc devenu légitime de questionner la viabilité des politiques du vieillissement et leur capacité de répondre adéquatement aux nouveaux besoins des personnes âgées. Cet article synthétise une revue de littérature effectuée sur ce thème et qui a pour principal centre d'intérêt le Canada. Elle inclut aussi d'autres pays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".