MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1583398426 · doi:10.1109/apec.2015.7104541

Fourth order L3C resonant converter for wide output voltage regulation

2015· article· en· W1583398426 on OpenAlexaff
Navid Shafiei, Martin Ordonez, Chris Botting, Marian Craciun, Murray Edington

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsDelta-Q Technologies (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringVoltageBattery (electricity)Electronic engineeringInverterComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to fully cover the V-I plane of deep-cycle batteries, battery chargers should work under different loading conditions and output voltage, and should respond to different States of Charge (SoC). In this paper, a fourth order L3C resonant converter is introduced and employed as a battery charger. The analytical equation of the L3C voltage gain shows the possibility of regulating wide output voltage to an unprecedented degree within a narrow frequency range to cover the entire V-I charging plane of modern batteries. The topology integrates all of the parasitics elements into the resonant circuit, realizes ZVS for the inverter MOSFETs, and provides inherent over-current protection capacity. These advantages provided by the proposed L3C resonant converter make this topology an excellent candidate for use as a charger in Electric Vehicles. The experimental results extracted from a 220V DC; 550W resonant converter platform with a peak efficiency of 96:5% exhibit the excellent performance of the proposed converter for battery charger applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207