MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1583495507 · doi:10.23919/eumc.2010.5616009

Gain enhancement of a circularly polarized microstrip patch antenna surrounded by a circular mushroom-like substrate

2010· article· en· W1583495507 on OpenAlexaff
Halim Boutayeb, Tarek Djerafi, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaCircular polarizationCoaxial antennaOpticsMaterials scienceAntenna measurementRadiation patternMicrostripAntenna (radio)PhysicsOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of a circularly polarized microstrip patch antenna is improved using a circular mushroom-like substrate. The microstrip patch antenna is fed by a coaxial probe and is integrated within a circularly periodic structure to increase the antenna gain. The circular mushroom-like structure is a combination of two periodic structures with different periods. One is made of metallic rings and the other of grounding vias, which are disposed such as to form a radially and circularly periodic structure. With the proposed concept, an antenna prototype operating at 5.8GHz was fabricated and tested. The axial ratio, radiation patterns and return loss obtained from measurements show a good circular polarization, impedance matching and a gain enhancement of the proposed antenna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207