MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1583629958 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.094112

Ferroelectric properties of monoclinic<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PbTiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>crystals

2002· article· lv· W1583629958 on OpenAlexaff
Alexei A. Bokov, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclinic crystal systemPhase boundaryFerroelectricityMaterials scienceDielectricPiezoelectricityPolarization (electrochemistry)Phase (matter)CrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Condensed matter physicsCrystal structurePhysicsChemistryPhysical chemistryOptoelectronicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A monoclinic phase was recently discovered near the morphotropic phase boundary in several high-performance piezoelectric perovskite solid solutions, but its properties have not been reported. In this paper the dielectric, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric properties of the monoclinic Pm phase in the $(1\ensuremath{-}x)\mathrm{Pb}({\mathrm{Mg}}_{1/3}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{2/3}){\mathrm{O}}_{3}\ensuremath{-}x{\mathrm{PbTiO}}_{3}$ perovskite system are studied. In a (001)-oriented crystal of composition $x\ensuremath{\approx}0.33,$ ferroelectric hysteresis loops with remanent polarization of 23 $\ensuremath{\mu}{\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ are displayed. In poled monoclinic crystals, under a unipolar drive up to 10 kV/cm, the domain walls remain unchanged and the polarization and longitudinal strain change almost linearly, but the piezoelectric response ${(d}_{33}=9\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{N})$ is much weaker than in the rhombohedral phase of close composition. The relative dielectric permittivity of the Pm phase is also smaller (with a small-signal value of \ensuremath{\sim}2500), but the piezoelectric constant ${(g}_{33}=3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}2}{\mathrm{m}}^{2}/\mathrm{C})$ and the electromechanical coupling factor ${(k}_{t}=0.60)$ are practically the same as in the rhombohedral phase. The properties of the various phases in the range of the morphotropic phase boundary are related to the different rotation paths of the polarization vector induced by the external drive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207