Un cuaderno de versos manuscritos en español de ca. 1550 en el Archivo Histórico de Protocolos de Barcelona
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a multi-part study centering on a hitherto unknown-to-exist, mid-sixteenth-century Spanish poetic anthology exhumed in Barcelona’s Notarial Archives. The ms. includes poems authored by Garcilaso, Cetina, Diego Hurtado de Mendoza, Montemayor, and Oropesa. Also, many of the twenty-eight poems included herein are anonymous, and several entirely new, in the sense that their first verses have never been catalogued in academic databases. The collection includes two distinct series of poems: biblical ballads and a long mythological work, as well as numerous Italianate-verse sonnets and a poem in tercets, characteristic of the fresh wave of Petrarchism transforming the discourse of literature of the Iberian Peninsula at the time. The study includes an introductory essay, followed by a critical edition of the manuscript, and a photographic facsimile of the original. This is followed by a series of biblical ballads in Spanish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".