Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extension du domaine de la lutte met en scène un narrateur anti-héros qui sombre graduellement dans la dépression. Le monde qu’il habite lui paraît alors de plus en plus étrange. Dans une lutte à finir avec le genre humain, le protagoniste tentera de convaincre un collègue de travail de commettre un meurtre, avant de retourner cette violence contre lui-même et de se retrouver en institution psychiatrique. Cet article propose de revoir la notion d’étrangeté à la lumière de la position qu’occupe ce narrateur, soit celle d’un observateur-ethnologue qui, malgré son état dépressif, conserve cette sorte d’hyperacuité du regard et de l’analyse qui lui permet d’appréhender le monde autrement, en dégageant à la fois une théorie du libéralisme économique et sexuel, et une vision poétique de la réalité basée sur l’expérience de l’étrangeté — comme si la dépression ouvrait un autre espace de conscience, affligeant mais cristallin, sombre et pourtant salvateur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".