MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1583883039 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1466041

A 4-Bit 5GS/s Flash A/D Converter in 0.18μm CMOS

2005· article· en· W1583883039 on OpenAlexaff
Samad Sheikhaei, Shahriar Mirabbasi, A. Ivanov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlash ADCEffective number of bitsComparatorLeast significant bitCMOS4-bitFlash (photography)Digital-to-analog converterVoltageAnalog-to-digital converterOffset (computer science)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 4-bit 5 GS/s flash analog-to-digital converter (ADC) is designed and simulated in a 0.18 /spl mu/m CMOS technology. Low-swing operation both in the analog and the digital circuitry results in high-speed low power operation. The ADC dissipates 70 mW power from a 1.8 V supply while operating at 5 GHz. Offset averaging is used to minimize the effect of comparator offsets. Simulation results show that offset voltages with 67 mV standard deviation (i.e., 1 LSB) can be tolerated. Static INL and DNL errors are 0.34 LSB and 0.24 LSB respectively, and the ENOB is 3.65 bits. The simulation results of this non-time-interleaved flash ADC demonstrates a significant improvement in terms of power and area compared to those of previously reported ADCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207