MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1583940425 · doi:10.29173/lirg170

Your Choice Books

2009· article· en· W1583940425 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Information Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisadvantagedSample (material)Library scienceSociologyQualitative propertyPsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the summer of 2003, a three-month trial
 project, Your Choice Books, was undertaken on behalf of
 Warrington Library, Museum and Archives Service. A
 selection of existing library stock was relocated to the
 local YMCA, which is frequented by homeless people,
 in an attempt to combat social exclusion. Basic
 questionnaires were distributed to users of the YMCA
 and to members of library staff. This resulted in
 qualitative data determining interest in the programme
 from a sample of YMCA visitors and challenged staff to
 consider their social conscience with regards to those
 disadvantaged by homelessness. Quantitative data was
 obtained by tabulating responses using the statistical
 analysis package SPSS.The findings revealed this to be a
 successful project which, after careful consideration
 and discussion, is to continue indefinitely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.047
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it