La gobernanza y la gobernabilidad ambiental un estudio desde el modelo de geografía y desarrollo. El caso de los alimentos transgénicos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLa adopcion colombiana del Protocolo de Bioseguridad Cartagena-Montreal complementario del Convenio sobre Biodiversidad Rio 1992, escenifica un marco de referencia de gobernanza ambiental sanitaria y agricola, de un orden glocal tendiente a incorporar a la sociedad civil, en el agendamiemto, y evaluacion de las mencionadas politicas publicas. Por otra parte en el periodo de estudio 2002-2008 se despliega por parte del gobierno colombiano el uso de una politica publica agricola global que obedece a un modelo de desarrollo dependiente Centro Periferia y de Economia Ambiental, en donde el pais renuncia a una proteccion de riesgos inciertos que precautoriamente, se reconocen por el derecho ambiental internacional desde el Protocolo de Bioseguridad. EnglishThe adoption Colombian Cartagena Montreal Biosafety Protocol, supplementary to the Convention on Biodiversity Rio 1992, staged a framework of environmental governance, health and farming, tending a glocal order to incorporate civil society in agendamiemto, and evaluation of these policies) public. Also in the 2002-2008 study period is displayed by the Colombian government to use a global agricultural public policy that follows a development model dependent Periphery and Center for Environmental Economics, where the country�s renunciation of protection precautionary measure uncertain risks that are recognized by international environmental law from the Biosafety Protocol
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".