MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1584232744 · doi:10.7202/032476ar

Postglacial Vegetational History of the Eastern Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland, and Holocene Climatic Change Along the Eastern Canadian Seaboard

2007· article· en· W1584232744 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Joyce Brown MacPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsHoloceneTundraPeninsulaRadiocarbon datingGeologyStadialPhysical geographyWoodlandVegetation (pathology)PrecipitationShrubPeriod (music)Tree lineHolocene climatic optimumGeographyArchaeologyClimate changeOceanographyEcologyPaleontologyArctic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two radiocarbon-dated pollen profiles from the eastern Avalon Peninsula suggest late déglaciation (probably no earlier than 9700 BP at the coast), followed by a brief period of tundra vegetation. After 9300 BP a rich shrub tundra at lower elevations was invaded by spruce, balsam fir and tree birch until at ca 8400 BP the vegetation was an open woodland. The forest remained open for the next 3000 years; evidence of fire and the continuous presence of Populus suggest drier and warmer conditions than at present. The period of maximum warmth, ca 5400-3200 BP, saw the closing of the forest cover, a rise in the level of the tree limit in the interior upland and an increase in precipitation. After 3200 BP decreasing temperatures resulted in a lowering of the tree limit. The climatic changes inferred for the Avalon Peninsula are compared with those inferred from palaeo-environmental studies along the eastern North American seaboard from Baffin Island to New England. A sequence of changing controls on the regional atmospheric circulation during the Holocene is suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207