Bibliographic record
Abstract
Centred on an idea of materialistic immanence, the thesis aims to outline an aesthetic "system" in opposition to the romantic and idealistic aesthetic systems (confronting mainly with aesthetic notions from Platonism and German idealism, but also with some notions from M. Heidegger).In the course of the thesis it is central to discuss about the possibility of thinking through images and the implications for philosophical, political and historical need to mix up science with poetry.The work, conceived regarding James Joyce's Ulysses, aims to understand what the conceptions of history, philosophy and politics can learn from the experience of literature, for this, the thesis analyses the works of Homer, Plato, G. Vico, Th.Adorno and B. Spino-za, in addition to these authors, there is a strong presence of K. Marx and S. Beckett.The work unfolds from the 12th chapter of Ulysses, where Bloom confronts the citi-zen.This confrontation in a Dublin pub is an anachronic "metempsychosis" of the confrontation between Odysseus and Polyphemus in the Homeric cave present in the Odyssey.The thesis examines five historical "reincarnations" of this cavernous confrontation, following the order of the chapters, we have: ch.I -- Joyce's Ulysses; ch.II -- Dialectic of Enlightenment, especially 'Odysseus or Myth and Enlightenment' by Adorno and Horkheimer; ch.III --New Science, especially 'The discovery of the True Homer' by Giambattista Vico; ch.IV --Homer's Odyssey interpreted through the cunning intelligence of the Greek Métis; ch V --Joyce's Ulysses, especially chap.XII of the novel.The conclusion of the work aims to retrace the course of the thesis demonstrating how an idea of materialistic immanence based on the philosophy of Spinoza was implicitly the fundament of our Aesthetics of Immanence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".