De la genèse du texte typé : pour une autre approche de la question de typologie des textes spécialisés
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La problématique de la typologie est de ces sujets considérés dénués d’intérêt et, de ce fait, boudés par la recherche en linguistique du texte. Dans le présent article, l’auteur essaie de montrer qu’en reprenant de tels sujets et en élargissant l’angle d’analyse, il est possible de leur conférer un nouvel intérêt. Ainsi, en empruntant à la philosophie générale des concepts comme l’épistémè (Foucault), à la philosophie linguistique, celui de formation discursive (Foucault), à la linguistique, ceux d’interdiscours, d’intertexte et de surface discursive (Courtine), il tente de démontrer que la banalité de la problématique de la typologie n’est pas liée au sujet en lui-même, mais au niveau auquel opère l’analyse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.032 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".