Modeling and pricing cloud service elasticity for geographically distributed applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud service providers (CSP) strive to effectively provision their cloud resources to ensure that their hosted distributed applications meet their performance guarantees. However, accurately provisioning the inter-data centers network resources remains a challenging problem due to the cloud hosted applications' workload fluctuation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that enables a CSP to offer Elasticity-as-a-Service (EaaS) for inter-data centers communication in order to guarantee the performance of distributed cloud applications. The contributions of the proposed work are two fold; first, we develop an efficient approach that enables the CSP to estimate and reserve the pool of network resources needed to fulfill the demands imposed by the network workload fluctuations of applications subscribing to this service. The approach allows the CSP to offer communication EaaS at differentiated levels based on the degree of bandwidth-sensitivity of the distributed cloud applications. In order to capture the inter-data centers network activity of hosted applications, we model their workloads using Markovian modeling. The second contribution is a novel dynamic pricing mechanism for network EaaS offerings that can be employed by the CSP to maximize the expected long-term revenue, and to regulate network elastic demands. Performance evaluation results demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed approach, the higher accuracy of our prediction method, and the increase in the CSPs net profit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".