MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1584601292 · doi:10.1306/13251331m94389

Mass Balance and Thrusting in Detachment Folds

2011· book-chapter· en· W1584601292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Suppe

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFold (higher-order function)Detachment faultPaleontologyGeometryExtensional definitionTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Detachment folds seem conceptually the simplest of all fault-related folds, yet they continue to offer substantial and rich challenges that are symptomatic of fault-related folding in general. The standard picture of detachment folds goes back at least to August Buxtorf's widely reproduced 1916 regional cross sections of the Swiss Jura in which he interpreted the Jura box folds to be regionally detached from the basement along a weak layer of Triassic evaporites. Most theoretical and conceptual models of detachment folding have followed Buxtorf's model with a twofold mechanical stratigraphy composed of a competent flexural lid conserving bed length overlying a weak basal detachment layer that conserves only volume. However, this standard model of detachment folding has a fundamental and classic problem from a balancing perspective, which is outlined in this chapter. Furthermore, the classic Jura box folds drawn by Buxtorf were in fact not at all constrained by subsurface data, except along the Grenchenberg railroad tunnel where a surprising and much more complex structure was encountered, involving a strongly folded thrust fault that was intersected three times in the 8.5-km (5.3-mi)-long tunnel. Hans Laubscher argued that such complexly folded thrust faults are in fact typical of many Jura box folds. Analogous structures have been observed in Canada, Mexico, and Spain. I argue here on the basis of mass-balance considerations that detachment folds with folded thrusts are one of several theoretically expected modes of detachment folding. More broadly, the classical models of detachment folding assume a closed-system behavior in which all shortening is locally consumed in the fold. These classical models include (1) local flow of a weak basal layer, for example, salt (Wiltschko and Chapple mechanism) and (2) pure-shear detachment folding (Groshong and Epard mechanism). Here we discuss several additional models of detachment folding, including open-system behavior with (3) far-field flow of the weak basal layer, (4) roof detachments above the basal layer, and (5) roof ramps above the basal layer such as the folded thrust fault of the Grenchenberg anticline. In this final mechanism, the flexural lid or other more competent stratigraphic intervals shorten by a combination of fault slip and flexure, whereas the less competent intervals, including the basal layer, shorten by flow. All of these mechanisms are end members capable of existing in combination within actual folds; several examples combine two or three of these mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooksSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207