MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W158461057 · doi:10.1386/ijfs.13.2.287/1

Le thtre franco-ontarien: Entretien avec Jol Beddows, directeur artistique du Thtre la Catapulte, Ottawa, Canada

2010· article· en· W158461057 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alvina Ruprecht

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Francophone Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchContext (archaeology)HumanitiesArtArt historyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Thtre la Catapulte, officially created in 1991, is the most recent Franco-Ontarian theatre in the Ottawa area. It now benefits from an auditorium and rehearsal space at La Nouvelle Scne, a theatrical and cultural centre constructed in 1999, which has contributed enormously to the development of francophone theatre and culture in Ottawa. Jol Beddows has been the Artistic Director of the Thtre la Catapulte since 1998. Jean Stphane Roy will be taking over from him in July 2010. Totally bilingual, and both a theatre director and a professor in the Department of Theatre at the University of Ottawa, Jol Beddows has ensured a performance programme that has opened up new artistic possibilities for francophone theatre in Ontario. In the following discussion he retraces the history of the Thtre la Catapulte, setting it within the broader context of francophone theatrical activity in the province from the creation of the first troupe, the Thtre des Lutins, in 1970.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0300.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Francophone StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207