Prevalence of Cardiac Sarcoidosis in Patients Presenting with Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease of unknown etiology, which involves the heart in 5-25% of cases. Although ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been reported as the first presentation of sarcoidosis, its prevalence has not previously been investigated. In this prospective study, we sought to systematically investigate the prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) in patients presenting with monomorphic VT (MMVT) and no previous history of sarcoidosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with MMVT to a tertiary care center were screened for inclusion. Patients with idiopathic VT, VT secondary to coronary artery disease, or prior diagnosis of sarcoidosis were excluded. Included patients underwent F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scan. In subjects with PET scanning suggestive of active myocardial inflammation, histological diagnosis was confirmed through extracardiac or endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). RESULTS: A total of 182 patients presented to our institution with VT between February 2010 and September 2012 and 14 subjects met inclusion criteria. Within this group, six of 14 (42%) patients had abnormal PET scans suggesting active myocardial inflammation. Four of the six patients had tissue biopsies that were diagnostic of sarcoidosis; the remaining two patients had guided EMB indicating nonspecific myocarditis. Atrioventricular block was observed in three of four (75%) patients with CS and none in 10 of the others (P = 0.022). Three of the four patients had pulmonary sarcoidosis and one patient had isolated CS. All four patients were treated with corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, four of 14 (28%) patients presenting with MMVT (without idiopathic VT, ischemic VT, or known sarcoidosis) had CS as the underlying etiology. Clinicians should consider screening for CS in patients with unexplained MMVT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".