MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585177820

Pierre Gendron, La modernité religieuse dans la pensée sociologique. Ernst Troeltsch et Max Weber. Préf. de Guy Rocher. Saint-Nicolas – Paris, Presses de l'Université Laval – Le Cerf, 2006, 107 p.

2006· article· fr· W1585177820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michaël Löwy

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives de sciences sociales des religions · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesSecularizationModernityTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce petit livre est une interessante etude comparative de la sociologie des religions de Troeltsch et Weber. Le principal handicap de l'auteur est une connaissance limitee de la langue allemande, qui le fait citer les principales œuvres de Troeltsch a partir de traductions anglaises (il en existe tres peu en langue francaise). Le livre est divise en quatre chapitres : « Religion et modernite » ; « Histoire et signification » ; « Secularisation et foi chretienne » ; « Le fait religieux dans la ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.025
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives de sciences sociales des religionsSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207