S’approprier une pratique inclusive : regard sur le sentiment de compétence de trois équipes-écoles au coeur d’un processus de changement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte pose un regard sur le questionnement d’enseignants et d’orthopédagogues engagés dans une démarche de recherche-action visant l’émergence de pratiques inclusives en contexte d’enseignement primaire. On y retrouve tant les principales craintes associées aux pratiques inclusives que celles associées à la transformation des rôles et à l’apprentissage au réel travail collaboratif entre enseignants et orthopédagogues. Ces craintes semblent intimement liées au sentiment de compétence des participants à la recherche. Enfin, des pistes de formation visant à soutenir les pratiques inclusives sont proposées par les participants. Ces pistes ne sont pas sans rappeler la place centrale qu’occupent la formation continue et la formation initiale en contexte d’inclusion scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it